Gender bias, really? all tasteful nudes are useless. taking pictures of a naked person is possibly the most unoriginal something can be.
9 out of 10 times tasteful nudes are like magazine covers but without the bikini/breifs! It is the idea behind something that makes it unique and amazing, this lazy shit here is just a naked person. So i have to ask myself who the hell gives a damn about seeing a naked person?
have some goddamned creativity people
also I take it up the ass, so your stupid "common male" assumption is rediculous.
I actually would like to thank people who take nudes because they help me visualize the human body and practice drawing it. Don't you dare say something is useful just because you don't see the use in it or understand it from more points of views. And you take it up the ass? Good for you. I didn't ask for your sexual orientation. I would like to see more of guys because I need to practice drawing different male body types because I am a female and I can't just look at myself in a mirror.
Because it is slightly sexist? Just like I didn't ask you if you fucking take it up the ass, but you decided that was necessary to inform me with. Besides, the part about nudity is true. You think artistic nudity is stupid, but without it, a lot of people's favorite artists may have never improved and become their inspirations. I wouldn't expect you to understand. You're probably not an artist. I mean, you could be, but you don't think like one.
Somebody suggested it so it got picked, you don't like it? Then go suggest some other photographs to the appropriate CV. DDs are not rewards, just a way to get a broader audience for ANYONE. As long as a work has been suggested by any random deviant it can be a DD. A DD is not an award given to the best of the best works out there.
Don't know why but this picture makes me feel pretty inconfortable and like.. what the fuk is this?? I think with at least boxers it would of been better. Personal opinion, sorry if this message will got haters, we all got our opinions.